šŸ’¬ Quotes

    šŸ’¬ King Lear:

    So we’ll live,/ And pray, and sing, and tell old tales, and laugh/ At gilded butterflies, and hear poor rogues/ Talk of court news; and we’ll talk with them too-/ Who loses and who wins; who’s in, who’s out-/ And take upon ’s the mystery of things,As if we were God’s spies; and we’ll wear out,/ In a wall’d prison, packs and sects of great ones/ that ebb and flow by th' moon.

    šŸ’¬ Finished reading: The Year of Magical Thinking by Joan Didion šŸ“š

    “A single person is missing for you, and the whole world is empty.” — Philippe AriĆØs, quoted by Joan Didion

    “You can love more than one person — of course you can. But marriage is something different. Marriage is memory, marriage is time… Marriage is also, paradoxically, the denial of time. For forty years I saw myself through John’s eyes. I did not age.”

    “I know why we try to keep the dead alive: we try to keep them alive in order to keep them with us. I also know that if we are to live ourselves there comes a point at which we must relinquish the dead, let them go, keep them dead.”

    šŸ’¬ ā€œThe death of a parent, despite our preparation—indeed, despite our age—dislodges something deep in us, sets off reactions that surprise us and that dredge up memories and feelings that we thought gone to ground long ago. We might, in that indeterminate period we call mourning, be in a submarine on an ocean’s bed, aware of the depth charges now near and now far, buffeting us with recollections. … Grief is different. Grief has no distance. It comes in waves, paradoxically sudden apprehensions that weaken the knees and blind the eyes and obliterate the dailiness of life.ā€ - Joan Didion, The Year of Magical Thinking

    šŸ’¬ ā€œAnd death with a top hat quietly laughing at us as he passed, even that we will miss. Even that we loved.ā€ - Steve Scafidi

    šŸ’¬ ā€œThe true has about it an air of mystery or inexplicability. this mystery is an attribute of the elemental: art of the kind I mean to describe will seem the furthest concentration or reduction or clarification of its substance; it cannot be further refined without being changed in its nature. It is essence, ore, wholly unique, and therefore comparable to nothing. No ā€œitā€ will have existed before; what will have existed are other instances of like authenticity. The true, in poetry, is felt as insight. It is very rare, but beside it other poems seem merely intelligent comment.ā€ - Against Sincerity, Louise Glück

    šŸ“– Thoughts on On Photography by Susan Sontag

    Finished reading: On Photography by Susan Sontag šŸ“š

    What a brutal criticism on photography.

    I don’t think Susan Sontag would have had an Instagram, to say the least.

    I agreed with a lot of her diagnosis of society’s relationship to the photograph and the camera: the way images can turn the world into something to be collected and consumed, how they push us toward spectatorship instead of action, and how easily they plug into surveillance, control, and commodified experience. But my problem starts when she absolutizes those insights.

    Sontag’s moral positioning against photographers, sentimentality, art movements, and pretty much anyone who has ever been interested in taking a photo feels at points insufferable and, ironically, distant from reality. To morally reject all photography, surrealism (yep, that means Picasso), and Joseph Cornell (who doesn’t like Cornell boxes?!) on the grounds of their supposed lack of realism, which she seems to treat as the pinnacle, is a bold move. She fights hard for that stance with sharp articulation, extensive research, and genuinely lovely prose, but it still reads as an overreach.

    However, some of the theories she puts forward really do shade in the non‑reality internet world we find ourselves in now, where so much of life is filtered through screens and feeds. Still, I’m not persuaded that her critique moves me enough to give up my film camera, or to treat every vacation snapshot—or every new parent taking another photo of their baby—as a moral or societal failure. Those photos can also simply be about care, memory, and connection, not just appropriation.

    I’ve noticed recently (and share) a growing hostility toward the photograph, driven by privacy concerns around AI and the fallout of living in a social‑media and ad‑saturated culture. That’s where Sontag’s idea of an ā€œimage worldā€ that hollows out experience feels newly useful. I will certainly be thinking about this book for awhile.

    Some šŸ’¬ thoughtful quotes:

    “Photographs are a way of imprisoning reality, understood as recalcitrant, inaccessible; of making it stand still.”

    “Whatever the moral claims made on behalf of photography, it’s main effect is to convert the world into a department store or museum-without -walls in which every subject is depreciated into an article of consumption, promoted into an item for aesthetic appreciation.”

    “Life is not about significant details, illuminated a flash, fixed forever. Photographs are. The lure of photographs, their hold on us, is that they offer at one and the same time a connoisseur’s relation to the world and a promiscuous acceptance of the world.”

    “Today everything exists to end in a photograph.”

    “As photographs give people an imaginary possession of a past that is unreal, they also help people to take possession of a space in which they are insecure. Thus, photograph develops in tandem with one of the most characteristic of modern activities: tourism.”

    “To photograph is to appropriate the thing photographed. It means putting oneself into certain relation to the world that feels like knowledge–and therefore, like power.”

    šŸ’¬ Quote:

    Poetry gets as close as possible to the unsayable and then fails—that failure is poetry. - Elizabeth Metzger